<td id="kg486"><optgroup id="kg486"></optgroup></td>
<button id="kg486"><tbody id="kg486"></tbody></button>
<li id="kg486"><dl id="kg486"></dl></li>
  • <dl id="kg486"></dl>
  • <code id="kg486"><tr id="kg486"></tr></code>
  • Amazon Sues 1,000 People Over Fake Reviews

    Oct 22, 2015

    The e-commerce giant hopes to crack down on bogus product reviews across the site.

    Internet users increasingly rely on online customer reviews when making spending decisions, whether they’re buying an iPhone case on Amazon or hiring an Uber ride in their hometown. But just how much can you trust those reviews?

    A new lawsuit in which Amazon accuses more than 1,000 people of offering to post bogus glowing write-ups for as little as $5 apiece might give you pause.

    The case, filed in Washington state court Friday by the nation’s biggest online retailer, casts light on what appears to be a burgeoning practice: the commissioning of paid, fake reviews that masquerade as testimonials from ordinary people.

    Fake reviews are nothing new to online retailing, and Amazon is far from the only big company affected. Yelp’s restaurant reviews and TripAdvisor’s hotel ratings have long been a target of critics who claim that merchants can easily post positive reviews of their own businesses.

    Amazon’s legal counteroffensive, however, appears to be one of the most aggressive attempts yet by a major U.S. e-commerce company to fight back.

    Its lawsuit alleges that individuals would write five-star reviews about products they never even tried, and plotted with product makers to subvert Amazon safeguards that are meant to bolster confidence in the website’s reviews.

    "Suing the reviewers is a way to discourage them from doing it again," said Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter. "They’re trying to make a statement that you can rely on the integrity of the reviews on the site."

    There are powerful incentives to plant fraudulent reviews.

    About 45 percent of consumers consider product reviews when weighing an online purchase, according to Forrester Research. Two-thirds of shoppers trust consumer opinions online, according to research by Nielsen.

    For small businesses, it can be more economical to pay for positive reviews than to buy advertising.

    For example, a half-star increase in a restaurant’s online rating can increase the likelihood of securing, say, a 7 p.m. booking by 15 to 20 percent, said Jenny Sussin, a director at Gartner Research. So a restaurateur might be tempted to pay $250 for 50 positive reviews online in the hopes of raising that rating.

    Online sites like Amazon, Yelp and TripAdvisor have worked hard to thwart the planting of fake reviews — a practice sometimes called "astroturfing," a reference to the synthetic grass used on sports fields.

    They employ computer algorithms and teams of investigators who scour reviews and delete suspicious entries. Often, only people who have paid for a product or service and been verified can post reviews.

    Yelp director of business outreach Darnell Holloway said that when suspicious reviews are found, the company puts a "consumer alert" badge on a company’s Yelp site for 90 days warning consumers that reviews might be deceptive. If the problem persists, Yelp removes all reviews of the company.

    Most recently, Yelp deleted all reviews of a business called Movers Alliance after if found the company was pressuring customers to write positive reviews.

    TripAdvisor says it has a team of 300 people using fraud detection techniques to weed out fake reviews.

    "In the first half of 2015 alone we took action against 29 different optimization companies around the world to put a stop to their activity," said spokesman Kevin Carter.

    But in general, experts say, fraudulent reviews aren’t going away anytime soon. Gartner estimates that 10 to 15 percent of all online reviews are fake.

    Legal recourse has been scarce. In 2013, the New York attorney general’s office said it had settled cases with 19 companies and secured $350,000 in penalties for fake reviews.

    In April, Amazon sued several websites that offered to produce positive reviews. Now it’s targeting the actual writers of the reviews — in this case, those who have accounts at Fiverr.com, a site for freelancers looking for work.

    In many cases, the writers ask product sellers themselves to write the review, and then they put their name on it, the Amazon lawsuit alleges. At least one would-be reviewer offered to receive an empty envelope from a seller to make it look as if the person had actually bought the product, according to the lawsuit.

    The defendants in the lawsuit are identified only by their online handles. Amazon is still working to determine their real names.

    Amazon is suing for unspecified damages and an order forcing the users to stop writing fake reviews. The Seattle company said the offenders are liable for breach of contract for violating Amazon’s terms of service.

    Forrester analyst Sucharita Mulpuru said that ultimately it’s up to the consumer to read and evaluate reviews online carefully.

    "You never know until the product actually comes to you if a review is real or not," she said. "Online shopping is a leap of faith."

     

    Source: Huffington Post


    Copyright ? 2017, G.T. Internet Information Co.,Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产suv精品一区二区6| 小受被强攻按做到哭男男| 国产大片免费观看中文字幕| 亚洲女初尝黑人巨高清| A毛片毛片看免费| 精品久久久久亚洲| 扒美女内裤摸她的机机| 国产在线中文字幕| 九九热爱视频精品| 久久久久无码国产精品不卡| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠69| 欧美丰满熟妇BBB久久久| 国产精品毛片一区二区| 亚洲欧美中文日韩v在线观看| 99久久免费国产精品| 特级毛片A级毛片100免费播放| 好男人在线社区www| 免费少妇荡乳情欲视频| 一个人看的www视频免费在线观看 一个人看的www高清直播在线观看 | 特黄特色大片免费播放路01| 女人18毛片水最多| 伊人久久波多野结衣中文字幕| www.日本在线观看| 色老二精品视频在线观看| 无码无套少妇毛多18PXXXX| 国产va欧美va在线观看| 中文字幕av一区乱码| 精品人人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 女人18毛片a级毛片| 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线| 3d区在线观看| 校花的好大的奶好爽漫画| 国产女人乱人伦精品一区二区 | 中文字幕日本最新乱码视频| 精品国产一二三产品价格| 大香伊人久久精品一区二区| 午夜视频在线观看国产www| zztt668.su黑料不打烊| 毛片A级毛片免费播放| 国产精品亚洲色婷婷99久久精品| 冬日恋歌国语版20集中文版|