<td id="kg486"><optgroup id="kg486"></optgroup></td>
<button id="kg486"><tbody id="kg486"></tbody></button>
<li id="kg486"><dl id="kg486"></dl></li>
  • <dl id="kg486"></dl>
  • <code id="kg486"><tr id="kg486"></tr></code>
  • Apple seeks $180m more from Samsung in patent dispute

    Dec 29, 2015

    A sales assistant uses her mobile phone next to the company logos of Apple and Samsung at a store in Hefei, Anhui province September 10, 2014. (Jianan Yu/REUTERS)

    Just over a week after Samsung paid Apple more than $548-million for infringing the patents and designs of the iPhone, Apple has asked a U.S. court to force its biggest smartphone rival to cough up even more.

    In court papers filed on Wednesday, Apple Inc said Samsung Electronics Co Ltd owes nearly $180-million in supplemental damages and interest.

    These further damages relate to five Samsung devices that infringed Apple’s patents and were sold after a 2012 jury verdict finding Samsung liable in the dispute.

    Representatives for Samsung and Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.

    The long-running dispute dates back to 2011, when Apple sued Samsung alleging the South Korean electronics company violated its patents and copied the look of the iPhone. After the 2012 verdict, Samsung was ordered to pay $930-million to Apple.

    In May a U.S. appeals court stripped about $382-million from that total, saying Cupertino, California-based Apple could not protect the phone’s appearance through trademarks. Samsung paid Apple the bulk of the judgment, $548.2-million, on Dec. 14.

    In a case that has come to epitomize the global smartphone war, Apple and Samsung have more battles ahead. Another trial over remaining damages related to the appeals court decision is set to go ahead next March in San Jose, California federal court.

    Samsung has also appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The company said Apple was compensated far more than it deserved for patents on designs of the iPhone’s front face, bezel and application icons. The high court must first decide whether or not to accept the case for review.

    The case is Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 11-cv-1846.

    Source: THE GLOBE AND MAIL


    Copyright ? 2017, G.T. Internet Information Co.,Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    主站蜘蛛池模板: 秋葵视频在线观看在线下载| 激情综合色五月六月婷婷| 亚洲av无码成人精品国产| 好男人视频社区精品免费| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区中| 亚洲码一区二区三区| 女人洗澡一级毛片一级毛片| 美女跪下吃j8羞羞漫画| 久久综合图区亚洲综合图区| 国语自产偷拍精品视频偷拍| 久久综合给合综合久久| 国产精品久久国产精品99| 男人和男人一起差差| 一二三高清区线路1| 国产xxxx色视频在线观看| 欧美日韩国产高清视频| 中文字幕在线2021| 国产成人AV综合色| 激情艳妇之性事高h| 57pao一国产成视频永久免费| 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久久| 国产黄网在线观看| 欧美寡妇xxxx黑人猛交| 黄色网址免费大全| 久久精品国产2020| 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡无卡免费视频 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡网站免费 | 香蕉视频a级片| 亚洲免费视频播放| 国产精品亚洲二区在线| 最好看的最新中文字幕2018免费视频| 久久国产精品99精品国产987| 久久夜色精品国产亚洲AV动态图| 国产三级精品三级在专区中文| 性猛交╳xxx乱大交| 欧美黑人粗硬大在线看| 青青青激情视频在线最新| 两个人看的视频www在线高清| 亚洲视频天天射| 国产在线视频国产永久视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久| 欧美午夜伦理片|